The key submission details are as follows:

• Open to youth directors from the Asia-Pacific countries/regions (Aged 18 - 40)

• Internal pre-screening will be conducted for micro movies from each country/region

• Deadline for submission: 15 September 2026

• Upload micro movies to the drive with a link available for download.

• File shall contain Micro movie, poster, subtitles, Submission application, contact information, cast, introduction, brief summary of the content, creative concept, etc. that are related to the micro movie

• No entry fees

 

Micro Movie requirements:

• Maximum length: 20 minutes or less

• Video format: FHD (1920 x 1080p) or above, QHD or UHD is preferred, PAL format, 16:9 or 4:3 aspect ratio or any other suitable aspect ratio, minimum 720p resolution, H.264 or Apple ProRes 422 HQ codec, minimum 5 Mbps bitrate, MOV or MP4 container (DCP format required for traditional cinemas)

• English subtitles are required for all micro movies. Subtitles are required to be provided as a separate file with timestamp. (Optional to include Chinese subtitles)

• Compliance with the Film Censorship Ordinance (Chapter 392 of the laws of Hong Kong) and the Film Censorship Authority of Hong Kong: https://www.ofnaa.gov.hk/en/services/film_division/film_classification/index.html 

 

Prizes for selected Micro movie(s):

• Priority will be given to award-winning works from local and international competitions, with a maximum of two submissions per country/region.

• The selected directors/producers will be invited to attend and provide a sharing session at the Asia-Pacific Youth Micro Movies Festival, and will receive a trophy in recognition of their achievement. The format of the event maybe in person or online depends on the final arrangement of the organizing committee.

​

​

Evaluation Criteria

All submitted entries will go through an initial internal review. The judges will evaluate each work based on the following criteria:

​

1. Content & Theme (50%)

Judging criteria: Core narrative, Depth in relation to the theme, Narrative structure and innovative element

​

Relevance to the theme

• Does the work strictly align with the theme or convey a clear core value?

• Does the content reflect the relevant cultural background or social reality? Does it possess positive social value?

• Government alignment: Assess whether the content aligns with targeted public advocacy goals.

​

Innovation and originality

• Is the subject matter or perspective novel? Does it break through traditional narrative frameworks?

• Does it feature a unique angle or plot twist? Is the twist placed logically to enhance dramatic tension?

​

Narrative Structure and pacing

• Dramatic arc: Is the opening engaging? Does the story progress smoothly? Are the climax and ending logical, compelling, and emotionally impactful?

• Pacing control: Is the narrative tight and balanced, avoiding both unnecessary drag and rushed progression?

​

Emotion and resonance

• Does it evoke emotional resonance (e.g., moving, thought-provoking or surprising)?

• Does the thematic depth extend beyond the narrative to touch on social, huma, or cultural levels?

 

2. Filmmaking technique (30%)

Judging criteria: Visual language, technical execution, and artistic expression

 

Composition and camerawork

• Is the composition aesthetically pleasing and intentional (e.g., symmetry, blank or visual focal points)?

• Are camera movements (e.g., pans, tilts, zooms or tracking) smooth and supportive of the narrative?

• Is camera placement appropriate (e.g., point-of-view shots to enhance immersion)?

​

Visual effects and post-production

• Color grading: Does the color palette fit the theme (e.g., cool tones conveying alienation, while warm tones evoking intimacy)?

• Image quality: Are resolution and lighting handled professionally, free from overexposure or visual noise?

• Do post-production elements (e.g., visual effects, subtitles) feel natural and enhance the viewing experience?

​

Editing and sound design

• Is the editing fluid? Are transitions (e.g., hard cuts, fades) used appropriately?

• Does the visual rhythm match the narrative pacing without jarring jump cuts or unnecessary dragging?

• Sound design: Do the score, sound effects and ambient noise heighten the atmosphere? Are dialogue and volume levels properly balanced?

 

3. Acting & Performance (20%)

Judging criteria: Performance authenticity, characterization and Ensemble synergy

 

Acting quality

• Do the actors accurately convey their characters' emotions and personalities? Is the performance natural rather than stiff?

• Is line delivery clear and appropriate (e.g., language choice and tone matching the character profile)?

​

Character fit and interaction

• Do the actors' appearance and demeanor suit their roles?

• Is there strong chemistry and dynamic interaction between actors (e.g., natural rapport, believable conflict)?

​

Nuance and detail

• Do subtle facial expressions and physical gestures add depth to the characters?

• Does the acting enhance the narrative's credibility, especially during key emotional turning points?

​

​

Prohibited Content:

• Any micro movie element that is considered controversial, such as explicit sexual content, violation of human rights, religious intolerance, or excessive violence, is strictly prohibited.

• Any movies created or generated by Al will not be accepted.

​

Copyright and Permissions:

• Participants must ensure that they hold the necessary copyrights and permissions for all elements used in their films, including music, images, and other copyrighted material.